UNCG AAUP Chapter stands with Guilford College faculty and staff

This statement from UNCG Chapter President Michael Frierson was published in the News and Record, November 15, 2020.

https://greensboro.com/opinion/columnists/michael-frierson-guilford-cost-cutting-process-ignores-keyvoices/article_6cfdc07e-2378-11eb-a34f-4bfed40f0d85.html

If you wish to sign on in support of this statement, you may do so at

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfJ8ILRtqbQlb7Dxnw4pn8Jiw0d2Xj7MDd34jOvKh2GFDXB7g/viewform?gxids=7757

Guilford cost-cutting process ignores key votes

by Michael Frierson

The UNCG Chapter of the American Association of University Professors condemns the program prioritization process and the ensuing decisions by interim President Carol A. Moore resulting in proposed cuts that will damage faculty, staff and programs at Guilford College. Recognizing that President Moore and the institution face serious financial hurdles, it is important to note there has been no public demonstration from Guilford College’s administration of financial exigency, an imminent financial emergency which threatens the survival of the institution as a whole. To eliminate faculty, the most valuable resource of the institution, without an open admission of financial exigency, is short sighted and premature, and violates longstanding procedures established by the American Association of University Professors to ensure academic due process. It indicates the administration’s willingness to prioritize Guilford College’s public image over the damage inflicted on faculty and staff who have served the institution, many for decades. Razing academic programs in the middle of a pandemic, when federal relief for higher education may be imminent, given the change of direction in the federal government, is unconscionable.

We note that the faculty committees tasked by Moore with making decisions based on academic purposes did not recommend eliminating any majors or any faculty, but sought reasonable alternatives like early retirement and furloughs. By choosing to dismiss the advice of Guilford College’s experienced, committed faculty, Moore has seriously undermined shared governance, the idea that when institutions seek input from stakeholders, listen to that input, and use it in important decision-making processes, this sharing of power strengthens everyone’s confidence in the process and the institution.

The gutting of the sciences and the humanities that is being recommended cannot be a viable way forward for an institution like Guilford College for a number of reasons. First, the old adage is true: you don’t deserve the name ‘college’ if you don’t have a philosophy department. Can Guilford College really be successful long term when it goes even further to eliminate majors in history and religion, two subjects fundamental to the institution’s identity? How is the educational mission of Guilford College enhanced in the long term by the discontinuance of these majors? How can this decision even be successfully marketed to potential students? Will these draconian cuts prevent prospective students from being able to recognize this institution’s other distinctive qualities?

Second, the programs eliminated are at the core of Guilford College’s commitment to diversity and social justice. Losing them at this Quaker institution, with its particular history, while contemplating adding new and unproven master’s level programs is a damaging over reactionThe AAUP has argued since the 1920s that when retrenchment is necessary, expansions of programs in other areas should happen only if the institution has made every effort to find other employment in the institution for existing faculty and staff. At Guilford College, tenured faculty (some with more than 30 years of service) have been given notice of termination without any effort to place them in another position on campus, or even an offer for them to “teach out” their terminal year. When educational institutions begin to substitute corporate goals for educational goals. they lose their most committed supporters at precisely the time they need them most.

The UNCG Chapter of AAUP stands with faculty of Guilford College. We urgently call on interim President Carol A. Moore and the Guilford College Board of Trustees to suspend the proposed cuts to Guilford College’s academic programs and administrative staff for at least a year and to engage in meaningful shared governance with the faculty of Guilford College. We urge them further to follow the faculty handbook to the letter when dealing with impacted faculty, require highly paid administrators to share in the sacrifice asked from others, and consider more creative financial solutions like early retirement options, furloughs, and voluntary unpaid leaves, as previously recommended by Guilford College faculty committees

To do otherwise is a shameful betrayal of the Quaker values that gave birth to the institution.

A call for UNCG campus leaders — our Chancellor, our Provost and our Board of Trustees — to take action

The UNCG Chapter of the American Association of University Professors condemns, in the strongest terms possible, a proposed policy revision to be presented to the Board of Governors of the University of North Carolina this Thursday, September 17, 2020.  This proposal, if approved, will gut a principle that has guided the North Carolina consolidated university system since it was first launched in 1931:  shared governance, the idea that when local campuses seek input from stakeholders, listen to that input, and use it in important decision making processes, this sharing of power strengthens everyone’s confidence in the process and the institution.

The proposal has two parts.  First, in any search for a new chancellor, the UNC System President (currently Peter Hans) will have the power to insert two candidates.  And, second, the UNC President, regardless of the search committee’s deliberations and recommendations, can require that those two candidates “be part of the slate referred by the [local campus] board of trustees ” to the President for appointment as chancellor, should he choose.

These proposed changes will undermine the integrity of these important searches.  First, the changes will discourage high quality candidates of national and international standing from entering a search when the results can be easily overridden. Second, citizens of integrity will not serve the many hours required by these important searches if their efforts can be ignored.  Finally, the substantial costs paid by the taxpayers of North Carolina to hire executive recruiting firms will be for naught if the President of the UNC system can determine the result of any chancellor search.

The UNCG Faculty Senate has voted unanimously in opposition to this proposal, and the UNCG Chapter of AAUP joins our Senate in unanimous opposition to this proposal.  We call upon our campus leaders to fight this proposal:  Chancellor Frank Gilliam, Provost James Coleman, the deans of our respective schools, and our Board of Trustees.  We are dismayed by this proposal as we know you must be, and you have our support to publicly oppose this policy change.  UNCG faculty and students will fight for shared governance and stand with you when you stand with us in opposition to this  policy change.

–The UNCG Chapter of the American Association of University Professors

State of the Campus Essays

Last May, the UNCG Chapter of AAUP invited faculty to write about how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted their lives. Much has changed since May, and so UNCG AAUP put out a call for new essays from faculty, staff, and graduate students offering their own take on the “state of the campus,” taking into consideration not only the changes known and yet to be discovered as it relates to Covid-19, but also the national conversations that have bloomed from the spate of police killings of black people, the impending presidential election, and the future that remains to be told for UNCG, and higher education broadly, as a result of the ever changing sociopolitical, economic, and health landscapes.

To read the essays, please select the STATE OF THE CAMPUS ESSAYS tab from the menu above.

AAUP COVID-19 Challenge

AAUP COVID-19 Challenge

The UNCG chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) put out a call-for-papers about how the pandemic has affected the lives, research, teaching, and service of UNCG faculty members. Ten essays were selected to display the fortitude of the Spartan spirit during these unprecedented times. Donations to the Spartan Pantry in the amount of $1,500 have been made collectively by Chancellor Gilliam, Provost Dunn, and the UNCG AAUP chapter to help fight food insecurity for those in the Spartan community.


To read the challenge essays, please open the COVID-19 ESSAYS tab in the menu above.


We thank all who submitted entries for the “challenge” and hope everyone remains safe and healthy. Please consider joining the AAUP chapter as we continue to advocate for academic freedom and shared governance on the UNCG campus.

2019 AAUP LECTURE SERIES

Tuesday, January 22, 7 pm

Elliott University Center Alexander Room

DR. SAMUEL WINEBURG

Dr. Samuel Wineburg, the Margaret Jacks Professor of Education and a professor of history at Stanford University, directs the Stanford History Education Group.  Wineburg’s recent empirical study at Stanford, “How Young People Make Decisions about What to Believe on the Internet,” has been featured prominently in national media outlets such as NPR and The Wall Street Journal.

Monday, February 25, 7 pm

Elliott University Center Auditorium

DR. NANCY MACLEAN AND MR. RALPH WILSON

Dr. Nancy MacLean is the William H. Chafe Professor of History and Public Policy at Duke University and author, most recently, of Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America, a finalist for the National Book Award and the winner of the Los Angeles Times Book Award in Current Affairs and the Lillian Smith Book Award.

Mr. Ralph Wilson is the founder and research director of UnKoch My Campus, a cooperative campagin to expose and expel undue donor influence.  He is a mathematician turned resistance researcher with interests that include the corporate weaponization of academic networks.

Thursday, March 28, 7 pm

Elliott University Center Alexander Room

DR. MICHAEL JOSEPH ROBERTO

Dr Michael Joseph Roberto is the author of The Coming of the American Behemoth: The Origins of Fascism in the United States, 1920-1940 (Monthly Review Press, 2018).  Roberto taught contemporry world history at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University until his retirement in December 2016. Since 1980, he has lived in Greensboro and has been active in numerous political struggles in the city.

November 2018 AAUP events

Wednesday, November 7, 5:30

at Mad Hatter (201 Smyres Pl., Greensboro)

Meeting of Higher Education Association of the Triad (HEAT)

A gathering of academics from across the Triad to brainstorm how to activate additional campus chapters of AAUP.

 

Thursday and Friday, November 8 and 9

at UNC Chapel Hill Institute for the Arts and Humanities, Hyde Hall

The event is free, including LUNCH.

Please RSVP for lunch via email so we know how much food to order:

skleinman1@nc.rr.com

All events take place at Hyde Hall, Institute for the Arts & Humanities, UNC, Chapel Hill

Detailed schedule:

NOV. 8th, THURSDAY, 5:30-7:00

Joan W. Scott (Prof. Emerita, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton): Academic Freedom Under Attack: How Do We Respond?

NOV. 9th, FRIDAY, 9:30-4:30

9:30-10:30 “As Goes the Law School…So Goes the Campus,” Gene R. Nichol, School of Law (UNC CH); Erika K. Wilson, School of  Law (UNC-CH); Mark Dorosin, Julius L. Chambers Center for Civil Rights

10:45-11:45:  “Freedom for Fixed Term Faculty?” Elyse Crystall, English & Comparative Literature (UNC-CH); Sandy C. Smith Nonini, Anthropology (UNC-CH); Sarah A. Birken, Health Policy and Management (UNC-CH)

11:45-12:30 LUNCH (free)

12:45-1:45 “Threats to Academic Freedom from Inside and Out,” Sherryl Kleinman, Sociology (UNC-CH); Michael Behrent, History (Appalachian State University)

2-3 “The Campus Origins of Today’s Radical Right & the Crisis of Democracy,” Nancy MacLean, History (Duke)

3:15-4:30 “Going Forward: Re-launching an AAUP Chapter at UNC, Chapel Hill,” Discussion led by Erik Gellman (History, UNC-CH); Jay Smith (History, UNC-CH)

 

Report on AAUP National Meeting June 2018

This report by NCAAUP Vice-President Michael Behrent encapsulates the pressing concerns currently facing AAUP.  Highly recommended reading!

A Report on AAUP’s 104th Meeting

The following is a brief report on AAUP’s most recent national meeting, which I attended this past weekend. The 104th annual meeting of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) met June 14-17 in Washington DC. The event consisted of several overlapping meetings: a gathering of the collective bargaining units, a conference on higher education, and the association’s official business meeting. I attended the latter two.

The theme of AAUP President Rudy Fichtenbaum’s remarks to the association was “endangered species”: in the current environment, the principles AAUP cares about—academic freedom, shared governance, and tenure itself—face a serious risk of extinction. In many ways, this was the conference’s leitmotif.

The panels I attended at the Friday higher education conference called attention to some of the ways in which privatization and corporatization are fast transforming our profession and threatening its current form. Representatives from the Indiana AAUP conference talked about the recent acquisition by Purdue, one of Indiana’s major public universities, of Kaplan University Online, a for-profit university with a history of predatory practices. The new “university”—now dubbed “Purdue Global”—was acquired in an underhanded manner, with virtually no faculty involvement. When AAUP members tried to speak out against the acquisition by delivering comments to the appropriate accrediting body, they were issued a “cease and desist” letter. Faculty do not know who is teaching at “Purdue Global” or what kinds of courses it is offering, even though its classes now count towards university credit.

I also heard about the tremendous work being doing by UnKoch My Campus, an organization formed by former students at George Mason University and Florida State University. After much stonewalling from George Mason’s administration, the organization was able to obtain some of the donor agreements regulating the privately-funded institutes that have been set up on their campus. They have also sued George Mason university and its fundraising operations for lack of transparency.

The intellectual and political background to the situation that George Mason exemplifies were examined by the plenary session speaker, historian Nancy Maclean of Duke University, the author of Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right’s Stealth Plan for America. Recapping her book’s main arguments, Maclean explained how, beginning in the 1970s, University of Virginia economist James M. Buchanan allied with wealthy industrialist Charles Koch to formulate an ideology that equates the economy and property rights with “freedom” and government with “oppression.” On this foundation, they developed a covert plan to dismantle tax-funded public institutions and scale back many government regulations, while restricting democratic mechanisms that stood in the way of their efforts. According to Maclean, the dismantling of public schools and universities and the infiltration of institutions of higher learning by privately funded centers are crucial elements of this larger project, which is intended to culminate with a constitutional convention that many GOP-controlled legislatures have already authorized. Interestingly, several members of the Charles Koch Foundation and the Koch-funded Institute for Humane Studies were in attendance at the AAUP meeting.

Building on the work that AAUP has done this past year in North Carolina, notably our mobilization against the state’s “campus free speech” law, I presented a talk on the Goldwater Institute model bill that was the basis of this legislation. A brief interview I did for AAUP’s Facebook page is available here (scroll down a bit). If you have not done so already, I encourage you to read the report I cowrote with AAUP’s Government Relations Committee on the “campus free speech” movement.

The business meeting, which was held on Saturday, is the forum in which much of AAUP’s most important work gets done. One of its key tasks is to decide whether to place university administrations on the AAUP censure list. Administrations are placed on this list when they are found, after an investigation, to be in serious violation of academic freedom and shared governance, as defined in AAUP’s 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure. At this year’s meeting, one institution was considered for censure: the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Hank Reichman, on behalf of AAUP’s Committee A for Academic Freedom and Tenure, presented the recommendation. In August of last year, a UNL graduate student and lecturer, Courtney Lawton, was involved in an altercation with an undergraduate from the conservative campus organization Turning Point USA. Although the university changed its story several times, Lawton was ultimately removed from teaching responsibilities and became the target of political attacks by the Nebraska legislature. AAUP decided to recommend UNL’s administration for censure after Committee A sent an investigative team to Lincoln. The full report can be read here. AAUP voted unanimously to place the University of Nebraska-Lincoln administration on the censure list. In other business, Stillman College was removed from the list, and the University of Iowa had a sanction relating to shared governance practices lifted.

An issue that currently has AAUP greatly preoccupied is the Janus vs. AFSCME case, which the Supreme Court will most likely decide in upcoming weeks. This case challenges the right of unions to charge fees of non-union members who belong to collective bargaining units and benefit from collective bargaining agreements—i.e., so-called “fair-share” or “union security” agreements. Given the court’s conservative majority, it seems likely that it will decide in favor of Janus—in other words, that it will declare fair-share agreements to be in violation of the First Amendment. AAUP opposes this position in principle (earlier this year, it filed an amicus brief defending fair-share agreements). If the conservative majority prevails, this decision will also result in significant loss of revenue for the association: currently, about 42,000 of AAUP’s 52,000 members nationally belong to collective bargaining chapters (as opposed to advocacy chapters). The association is already slowing down some spending to be able to absorb the anticipated financial hit.

All these concerns—privatization, political attacks, and the assault on labor rights—explain why AAUP president Fichtenbaum warned that academic freedom and shared governance are “endangered species.” But he ended with a positive—though sobering—message: we need to learn to act collectively. Just because many AAUP chapters are not collective bargaining units does not mean they cannot be “unions.” Unions, he reminded the membership, existed long before collective bargaining rights. If we do not act collectively to defend our rights and our profession, no one else will.

Michael C. Behrent

Acting AAUP chapter president, Appalachian State University

Vice President, NC Conference of the AAUP

Grant Opportunities for Faculty Under Attack

Grant money is now available through National AAUP when individual faculty need financial support when seeking legal advice.

Below is a message from Henry Reichman, Chair of AAUP.

Faculty, even those with tenure, are feeling vulnerable these days. Increasingly under attack—from legislators who want to abolish tenure or withhold funding for controversial courses, from overzealous governing boards, and even from students who might accuse them of radicalism on the Professor Watchlist website—faculty sometimes feel compelled to self-censor or to change the way they teach. The time is now to stand up for academic freedom and the importance of higher education in a free and democratic society.

Through our grant programs, the AAUP Foundation supports individual faculty members who need legal or financial assistance after being terminated without due process. Foundation grants also support faculty engagement in shared governance, academic conferences, and other professional opportunities and provide critical funding for the AAUP’s work on academic freedom and faculty governance, costs that membership dues alone cannot cover.

Learn about the AAUP Foundation’s grant funds and guidelines.

A recent Academic Freedom Fund grant provided replacement income for part-time instructor of philosophy Nathanial Bork, who was summarily dismissed by the Community College of Aurora after saying he would send a report to the college’s accreditor criticizing its new Gateway to Success curriculum. Mr. Bork claimed that new requirements to lower standards in “gatekeeper” courses necessary for transferring to four-year institutions would inadequately prepare students for college-level work. His dismissal was the subject of an investigation by the AAUP’s Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure, which receives funding from the AAUP Foundation for investigations and reports. Delegates at the 2017 AAUP Annual Meeting will vote on whether or not to add the Community College of Aurora to the AAUP’s list of censured institutions.

Apply for the next round of AAUP Foundation grants by June 30.

The AAUP Foundation Legal Defense Fund supports faculty members in cases at the trial and appellate levels that implicate important legal rights, involve legal issues of national significance in higher education, and affect the careers of academics. Grant recipient Robin Meade—dismissed by Moraine Valley Community College after sending a letter criticizing the college’s treatment of adjunct faculty—won a settlement that affirmed the free speech rights of contingent faculty. And a New York Supreme Court ruling allowed grant recipients Marie Monaco and Herbert Samuels to continue their case challenging New York University Medical School’s salary reduction policy, used to slash their salaries after their net grant income declined due to loss of research data in Superstorm Sandy. Such legal victories make a difference for the academic profession as well as for individual faculty.

The AAUP Foundation also supports educational programs that advance the cause of academic freedom. We recently awarded a grant to Scholars at Risk—an international network that protects scholars and promotes academic freedom—for its Scholar Transition Program, which will provide training for higher education professionals who are the victims of external political upheaval. Academic freedom must not be subject to the whims of those in power—whether abroad or in this country.

Best regards,
Henry Reichman,
Chair, AAUP Foundation

Reclaiming Higher Education for All North Carolinians: A Vision Statement of the NC AAUP

The full statement includes explanations of each point in the vision and may be viewed and downloaded here:

aaup-collective-vision-across-nc-final

The preamble and outline of the statement follow:

At a time when the basic principles governing higher education throughout the country and in our state are being challenged, we, as professors in North Carolina universities, feel compelled to reaffirm our core beliefs. We speak not merely as private individuals and members of a profession, but as guardians of the public trust, whose responsibility it is, whether we teach at public or private institutions, to educate our citizens and promote knowledge. We hold the following educational principles to be self-evident and integral to the wellbeing and dignity of all North Carolinians:

Outline of our vision:

  1. Higher education is a human right that must be available to all NC citizens.
  2. State funding for the core academic mission of public higher education must be restored and must prioritize academics.
  3. The principle of shared governance is essential to preserving higher education’s core mission and values.
  4. A diverse range of course offerings and academic programs must be offered at each UNCG campus.
  5. Research must be a system-wide priority.
  6. Faculty must earn a living wage.
  7. Academic freedom remains essential to higher education’s mission.

 

Film Screening of ‘Starving the Beast’

starving-the-beast

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Highly Acclaimed Film on Threats to Public Higher Education Screened at UNCG

Why is college tuition increasing at alarming rates, causing crushing educational debts for many North Carolina students? Why are college courses increasingly taught by part-time faculty? What are the troubling consequences of our state legislature increasingly reducing the funding of higher education for the public good?

In Starving the Beast, Director Steve Mims lays out with calm, terrifying clarity how wealthy individuals like Grover Norquist and the Koch brothers are leading a concerted effort to transform taxpayer-funded institutes of learning and research into profit-making ventures in which students are passive consumers and universities are service providers.

University faculty, students, and staff along with the citizens of the Triad must see this critically important and timely documentary that will be shown at UNCG in the Elliott University Center Auditorium on Monday, January 30, 2017, at 6 pm.

Following the film, Gene Nichol, who is the Boyd Tinsley distinguished professor of law at UNC-Chapel Hill and the principal faculty member from the UNC system interviewed in the movie, will lead a discussion.

This film screening is free; however, donations will be welcomed at the door.

This event is co-sponsored by the UNCG Chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP), UNCG Faculty Senate, UNCG Graduate Student Association, and UNCG Humanities Network & Consortium.

Contact:
Susan Dennison
President, UNCG AAUP Chapter
stdennis@uncg.edu

###